benefits over other persons in contravention of Section 241 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992 and thus liable to penalties under Section 296 of the said Act. As his aider, Sompis is subject to
PICNI containing materially false or incorrect statement in order to deceive others. The action was violation of Section 312 of Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535. The Appeal Court overturned the
containing materially false or incorrect statement in order to deceive others. The action was violation of Section 312 of Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 The Appeal Court overturned the judgment of the
the penalty under Sections 312 and 315 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA), as the case may be. The said actions also caused damage to the company but brought about benefits to Mr
business. Hence, their actions were in violation of Section 90 and liable to penalties under Section 289 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992. On November 21, 2022, the Samutprakan Provincial Court
penalties under Section 272 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (“Securities and Exchange Act”). SEC Act S.300 in conjunction with 46 Settlement Committee Meeting No. 3/2026 Settlement Committee
penalty under Section 300 in conjunction with Section 278 and Section 302/1 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (the “Securities and Exchange Act”). This case is in the process of inquiry by the
Exchange Commission Re: Determination of Other Regulations of Associations related to Securities Business ____________________ By virtue of Section 14 and Section 234(7) of the Securities and Exchange Act
business operators which may be considered an act of co-principals or accomplices of the offenses.The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has issued a warning about the provision of services that may