loss. Their actions were in violation of Section 241, subject to sanctions under Section 296 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992). On June 18, 2014, Yongyuth and Vorapin agreed to enter

(CIG-W1) in 2010 for other persons? benefits. This caused BLISS to have 17.4 million baht loss from such investment in CIG-W1 during the period that CIG-W1 had high cost and almost expired and eventually

her client regularly as well as reported to her client on the summary of profit and loss on a monthly basis. On March 12, 2012, {A} made trading decisions without the client's instruction and payment

1-22, 2010. She had submitted trading reports via electronic channels and mobile phone to the client who accepted the transactions. Such trading had resulted in a 73,400 baht loss for which {D} paid

addition, certain conditions may cause disadvantage to the company. Besides, the company has no manifest business plan after selling out its core assets, putting the company at risk of having operating loss

because JTS has the net loss of 6.19 million Baht in prior quarter and 4.83 million Baht if compared with the same quarter in 2015. Mr. Pete accessed that information by virtue of his positions as a

2018, as a result Ms.Chantip avoided a net loss from the decrease of UVAN shares prices. 13/01/2021 agreed to comply with civil penalties determined by the Civil Penalty Committee as follows :

account to sold UVAN shares before UVAN disclosed the inside information to the public on 14 August 2018, so Ms.Chantip avoided a net loss from the decrease of UVAN shares prices. 13/01/2021 agreed to

on 9 September 2020 and later on 10 September 2020 Mr. Sittilarp sold his TASCO shares through Miss Panida Kerdtoob’s securities trading account to avoid loss before TASCO disclosed such information to

possessed the inside information that ICHI’s operating net profit decrease in the financial statement of 2016 which significantly fell from the operating net profit of Q4/2014 had a net loss of amount of