had to settle the purchase order before regular settlement period in order to avoid force selling. This action was considered that Wiroj failed to inform sufficient information by concealing important
and found that he failed to inform the rules of volatile stock such as stock's risk and settlement duties to the client before submission of purchase order. As a result, the client had to settle the
of Directors and the Audit Committee opine that the early retirement and the subsequent compensation payment to Kitti are justified, claiming that this decision will help resolve ongoing management
Following the concerns from the last public hearing in 2017 on the revision of the principles and regulations relating to the provident fund to resolve the issue that members did not have adequate
partial investment, granting the right of objection on material issues to REIT, having guidelines to resolve conflicts between REIT and investment partners, and providing a statement of opinions on
January 19, 2018. On January 19, 2018, the parties could not mediate. The court decided to make an appointment to settle the dispute by May 13, 2018. On February 13, 2018, the court scheduled the
mediation to be on January 19, 2018. On January 19, 2018, the parties could not mediate. The court decided to make an appointment to settle the dispute by May 13, 2018. On February 13, 2018, the court
Buildings to settle disputes in this case. The court has ordered according to the aforementioned compromise agreement, as the red case no. Por. 682/2562. On 23 August 2019, Subsidiary Company has already