could influence the client’s investment decision. She also gave inaccurate information related to the fund’s net asset value (NAV), redemption price and offer price to the client; (3) In the case of {C
ชื่อผู้ได้มา/จำหน่าย :?NORDEA 1 SICAV - FAR EASTERN VALUE FUND | ประเภทหลักทรัพย์ : หุ้น | วันที่มีหน้าที่ : 09/01/2550
ชื่อผู้ได้มา/จำหน่าย :?NORDEA 1 SICAV - FAR EASTERN VALUE FUND | ประเภทหลักทรัพย์ : หุ้น | วันที่มีหน้าที่ : 21/11/2549
ชื่อผู้ได้มา/จำหน่าย :?VALUE CAPITAL ASSET MANAGEMENT PTE LTD. | ประเภทหลักทรัพย์ : หุ้น | วันที่มีหน้าที่ : 25/05/2554
ชื่อผู้ได้มา/จำหน่าย :?VALUE CAPITAL ASSET MANAGEMENT PTE LTD. | ประเภทหลักทรัพย์ : หุ้น | วันที่มีหน้าที่ : 30/05/2554
was sufficient and appropriate with regard to the audit of the revenue and the accrued income which were material to the financial statements, causing her to fail to detect the fictitious revenue and
from SCB Securities Co., Ltd. that {A} frequently failed to record her clients' securities trading orders. She then admitted that when orders had been executed completely from many of her clients, she
received the report from Siam City Securities Co., Ltd., on its investigation into misconduct of Meaunchit who had sent trading orders of other individuals through her clients? accounts without such clients
October 2016, the said executives and their associates had jointly committed fraudulent acts by misappropriating the sale money of 25 issues of KC B/E, at the total value of approximately 425 million baht
who were her close relatives and friends instead. In so doing, she secretly used her supervisor’s computer to change the names of the persons having the right to such IPO allocation. Consequently, the