investigative expenses incurred by the SEC), refused to comply with the specified civil sanctions, which was deemed unwillingness to settle the case with the SEC at this stage. The SEC, therefore, has requested
instructed JAS to rectify those financial statements by recognizing the provision based on the best estimate of the expenditure required to settle the present obligation by taking into account factors such as
had to settle the purchase order before regular settlement period in order to avoid force selling. This action was considered that Wiroj failed to inform sufficient information by concealing important
and found that he failed to inform the rules of volatile stock such as stock's risk and settlement duties to the client before submission of purchase order. As a result, the client had to settle the
of Directors and the Audit Committee opine that the early retirement and the subsequent compensation payment to Kitti are justified, claiming that this decision will help resolve ongoing management
Following the concerns from the last public hearing in 2017 on the revision of the principles and regulations relating to the provident fund to resolve the issue that members did not have adequate
partial investment, granting the right of objection on material issues to REIT, having guidelines to resolve conflicts between REIT and investment partners, and providing a statement of opinions on
, which is deemed a refusal to resolve the case at the SEC level.The SEC has therefore submitted a written request to the public prosecutor to file a lawsuit against Miss Paranya in the Civil Court
so, which is deemed a refusal to resolve the case at the SEC level.Accordingly, the SEC has submitted a written request to the public prosecutor for filing a lawsuit against Mr. Suthee in the Civil