statements for Q2/2009 with SEC and the SET within specified period. The Court sentenced the accused to pay a fine of Baht 60,000. Since the accused pled guilty, the Court reduced the fines by half, resulting
for the year 2008, (4) the annual report for the year 2008, (5) the reviewed financial statements for Q1/2009, and (6) the reviewed financial statements for Q2/2009 to the SEC and the SET within the
year 2012 (Form 56-2, 2012) to the SEC and the SET within the specified period. The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order against the alleged offender; however, attempt to arrest the alleged
SEC and the SET within the specified period. The Bangkok South Criminal Court sentenced the accused to pay a total fine of Baht 337,000 and a further fine of Baht 200 each day starting from the next day
for the year 2012 (Form 56-1) to the SEC and the SET within the specified period. On March 26, 2014, the Bangkok South Criminal Court ruled against the accused for violating Section 56 and Section 274
year 2012 (Form 56-2, 2012) to the SEC and the SET within the specified period. The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order against the alleged offender; however, the alleged offender escaped and an
year 2012, (3) the annual registration statement for the year 2012 (Form 56-1, 2012), and (4) the annual report for the year 2012 (Form 56-2, 2012) to the SEC and the SET within the specified period. The
statements for Q1/2013 to the SEC and the SET within the specified period. The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order; however, attempt to arrest the juristic person representative failed and the statute
year 2012 (Form 56-2, 2012), and (5) the reviewed financial statements for Q1/2013 to the SEC and the SET within the specified period. The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order against the alleged
financial statements for Q1/2013 and Q2/2013 to the SEC and the SET within the specified period. The Bangkok South Criminal Court sentenced the accused to pay a total fine of Baht 347,500 and a further fine