The SEC’s examination of facts in this case has led to the consideration that Zipmex disseminated or certified information that were potentially misleading in substance regarding digital asset

Nakhonsawan Co., Ltd. and EA Solar Lampang Co., Ltd.), and Mr. Pornlert Techarattanopas. In this case, facts and evidence appeared, leading to the consideration that during the years 2013 – 2015, the three

because they were major shareholders. However, upon investigation, evidence was found indicating that this statement was inconsistent with the facts, as Mr. Boon Vanasin and persons in the Vanasin group had

Following a referral from the Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET) in 2022 and the SEC’s further investigation, the uncovered facts and evidence led to the belief that Mr. Pongsak Lothongkam, who at the

statements disclosed in the registration statements and draft prospectus and concealed the facts which should have been provided in the factsheets of the company’s corporate bond offering. STARK claimed that

companies should be careful in disseminating news or information related to the companies’ operations because disseminating news or information that is inconsistent with facts or may cause material

. Nevertheless, no facts appeared to demonstrate that Huobi would be able to rectify its work systems and ensure readiness of its personnel in accordance with the governing regulations within the requested

benefits, totaling 341,669 baht. In addition, Somchai arranged a suitability test for the client while giving information inconsistent with facts, and failed to ask the client to sign in acceptance of a

as Public Cheating and Fraud B.E. 2527 (1984), and reported the facts on the alleged offenses in accordance with the Law to the ECSD for further legal proceeding and relevant enforcement. The ECSD

-public facts that influenced the securities price. His act was liable to the offences under Section 241 and the punishments under Section 296 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA