should be around 230 ? 270 million baht and recommended SUPER shareholders not to approve the acquisition. Furthermore, IFA observed that payment condition for acquisition of ProOne shares was not fair
that time; given that it would support the company to extend business collaboration and widen its property development opportunity. In addition, {X1} Company would obtain dividend payment from SAMCO and
dividend payment from IT Q4/2012 operational result. The aforesaid action was in violation of Section 241 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) which shall be liable to punishment under Section
the price not exceeding 144 million baht, totaling the payment up to 278.80 million baht for the purpose of acquiring ?Station 1 @ China Town Project? (Station 1 Project). In order to continue Station 1
orders and payment. The said actions were in violation of Section 241 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992). As they agreed to enter the settlement procedure, the Settlement Committee
{X1} Company's plan to pay interim dividend at 0.94 baht per share, higher than the dividend paid during the past five years. In the scheme, {C} assisted {B} in making purchase orders and payment. The
financial benefits from trading derivatives on non-public information concerning JAS, i.e., dividend payment for the year 2015 and a repurchase scheme at the beginning of the following year, which he had
's shares at 142 million baht. As a result, IFEC unreasonably paid T&S for the additional payment of 13 million baht. Moreover, IFEC recorded the value of CRS's shares with the amount of 155
's shares at 142 million baht. As a result, IFEC unreasonably paid T&S for the additional payment of 13 million baht. Moreover, IFEC recorded the value of CRS's shares with the amount of 155
of CRS to buy CRS's shares at 142 million baht. As a result, IFEC unreasonably paid T&S for the additional payment of 13 million baht. Moreover, IFEC recorded the value of CRS's shares