venture of the Apollo’s deal and realized gain from the re-measurement of the remaining investment at fair values since Q2 2017. Appropriateness of the Funding Structure At the end of the year 2016, the

6 Total equity stood at Bt19,096mn, grew by 23% from end of FY2016, mainly from FY2017 net profit and the increase of capital, as previously mentioned. Capital Structure Net interest-bearing debt to

subsidiary. The appropriate of capital structure The Group’s debt to equity ratio as at 31 December 2017 is 2.0:1, which is increased from the ratio as at 31 December 2016 at rate of 1.6:1. It results from the

has a higher inventory and Current Portion of loans receivables from purchases accounts receivables increase. Source of Fund and Capital Structure The Company’s source of fund was divided to share

(Baht per share) 3.95 2.12 -46% 3 Sales and Revenues Structure for the first quarter of 2020 - Credit Card Credit cards turnover shared 66% of total turnovers. In the first quarter of 2020, the

the Funding Structure In 2018, the Company had total debt to equity ratio of 16.1 times, as compared to 13.3 times in 2017. The interest- bearing debt to equity ratio was 10.8 times as compared to 8.9

equity. Appropriateness of the Funding Structure In 2018, the Company had total debt to equity ratio of 16.1 times, as compared to 13.3 times in 2017. The interest- bearing debt to equity ratio was 10.8

services revenue (%) 31.18% 30.84% Performance Ratio Return on Equity (ROE) (%) 10.75% 11.18% Return on Assets (ROA) (%) 5.80% 5.91% Capital Structure and Debt Ratio Debt to Equity ratio (time) 0.83 0.84

% from THB 109mn in 1Q 2018 to THB 457mn, mainly due to the aforementioned consolidation. Trans.Ad Group’s cost structure is characteristically higher than MACO’s core business which is advertising, as a

Structure In Q1 2019, the Company had total debt to equity ratio of 19.4 times increased from Q1 2018 at 16.1 times. The interest-bearing debt to equity ratio was 13 times increased from Q1 2018 at 10.8 times