of service and SG&A. As a result of demand weakness, EBITDA in 1Q22 dropped -0.8% YoY and -2.3% QoQ to Bt22,404mn with a margin of 49.5%. Following declined EBITDA, AIS reported a net profit of

at a higher rate than the decreased rate in revenue. Mostly because the projects’ gross margin in 2022 is slightly higher than in 2021. In addition, in 2022, the situation of the COVID- 19 epidemic

a rebound in demand of enterprise customers from a clearer political situation and a sizable project closed in the quarter. The strategy for the enterprise segment continues focusing on high-margin

% Gross profit margin* (%) 20% 27% 29% 2% 9% Net profit margin (%) 14% 16% 18% 2% 4% Management Discussion & Analysis Management Discussion & Analysis (MD&A) Q1/2018 Management Discussion & Analysis The

control. Profit 1) Gross profit was Bt183.8 1mn, an increase from 1Q17 which was Bt179 .19mn. Gross profit margin was 21.8% of total revenues from core business, a decrease of 25.1% in 1Q17, due to the

development expenses. For the year 2018, SAAM Group presented gross profit of THB 50.94 million, representing gross profit margin of 71.22%, a THB 0.41 million or 0.57% decrease from the previous year (2017

12,547 12,416 Gross profit margin (%) 22.84% 25.49% 26.48% Consolidated financial ratios 2018 2017 2016 Financial data and profitability ratios (continuous) Operating expense (include Research and

loss branches and turned to emphasize the other distribution channels where there were lower cost and higher margin. Another important development of mobile phone distribution business in the previous

residential business upon increasing revenues. Profit margin in this quarter stood at 36%, lowered from 43% in 3Q16, due to the front-end load service fee from the Maldives project, as previously mentioned. QoQ

increase of Bt571mn from 2016. Gross profit margin was 23.6% of total revenues from core business, a decrease of 25.4% in 2016 due to the increasing of money transfer transaction which is an added service to