to order or act in accordance with duties required to be performed. This case is in the process of inquiry by the inquiry official. SEC Act S.300 in conjunction with 56(2)(3)(4) Criminal Complaint

period. His order or action resulted in Bitazza’s offence regarding the digital asset dealer without a license owing to providing a service known as "Crypto Dust" and joint providing the product

relevant period. His order or action resulted in IBS Intensive's offence regarding the digital asset fund manager without a license owing to, during 17 November 2021 – 3 May 2022, providing services or

financial statements for Q1/2018 to the SEC Office and the Stock Exchange of Thailand within the period specified in the notification. The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order against the accused

), Section 16 and subject to sanctions under Section 125 respectively. The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order; however, the juristic person representative has evaded the arrest and has been pursued

and subject to sanctions under Section 125 respectively. The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order against the accused; however, the accused escaped and an arrest warrant was issued to bring the

(2003), Section 16 and subject to sanctions under Section 125 respectively. The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order against the accused; however, the accused escaped and an arrest warrant was

), Section 16 and subject to sanctions under Section 125 respectively. The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order against the accused; however, the accused escaped and an arrest warrant was issued to

), Section 16 and subject to sanctions under Section 125 respectively. The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order against the accused. SEC Act S.90 and Section 16 of DV Act Criminal Complaint Filed

. Chinnavat Chinsangaram before both of them becoming director of ADAM. The public prosecutor ordered a non-prosecution order. SEC Act S.307 311 in conjunction with 315 Criminal Complaint Filed with an