Sections 244/5 and 244/6 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA), the SEC therefore has filed a complaint against all 18 offenders with the ECD for consideration of further legal actions.In

order or an action which results in the offence that the company offered digital tokens to the public without an approval from the SEC Office. The Court of Appeal adjudicated that the defendant was guilty

in his capacity as the responsible person for the operation of Zipmex, which included ordering or acting and omitting to order or failing to act in any way that caused Zipmex to commit offenses in

published on SETLink by JKN was inaccurate or may have caused significant misunderstanding about JKN's information, which could impact investment decisions in JKN securities. JKN’s action was deemed a

, Section 313 and Section 315 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992), as the case may be. The SEC has therefore filed the criminal complaint against the two persons with the ECD for consideration

statements for the second quarter of 2018 to SET on 14 August 2018. The action of Chantip contravened Section 242(1) in conjunction with Section 243(1) which were subject to civil sanctions under Section

Section 90 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) which states that no person shall undertake securities business without license. Violator of Section 90 is subject to penalties under

January - 23 February 2017 before the financial statement year 2016 of ICHI was submitted to SET which helped Supanee to benefit from loss avoided.   The action of the offenders contravened the

Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) with details as summarized below:? M.L. Tossuwan, Premchai, Apinuntakan, Sarunya, and Kitja for ratifying GEN?s prior investment in P Plus P Plc. ' s shares and warrants

February 2014 before the information became publicly known on 28 February 2014. Such action was deemed taking an unfair advantage of other people.Chai?s misconduct was in violation of Section 241 and liable