enforcement but the debtor does not have enough assets to cover the debt. Later, the company filed a lawsuit against the debtor in a bankruptcy case towards the Central Bankruptcy Court on 11th December 2015
have enough assets to cover the debt. Later, the company filed a lawsuit against the debtor in a bankruptcy case towards the Central Bankruptcy Court on 11th December 2015. Then, on 7th March 2016, the
to make legal enforcement but the debtor does not have enough assets to cover the debt. Later, the company filed a lawsuit against the debtor in a bankruptcy case towards the Central Bankruptcy Court
and evaluation expense (11) (8) (15) 32% 75% (48) (45) -5% Gain (loss) from crude and product oil price hedging contract 46 (95) (138) N/A N/A 366 (442) N/A Gain (loss) from foreign currency forward
) / Total revenues from sales EBIT margin (%) = (Profit before income tax expense + Finance Cost) / Total revenues from sales EBITDA margin (%) = (Profit before income tax expense + Finance Cost
restaurants, (2) higher rental expense due to the head office moving to a new location where all subsidiary companies are located together for more efficient management and (3) the allowance for impairment of
340.51 49.19 14.4 Finance costs 369.63 352.58 17.05 4.8 Income tax expense 233.25 217.75 15.50 7.1 Total expenses 2,325.81 2,155.04 170.77 7.9 2,116.88 1,839.91 276.97 15.1 Non-controlling Interests 36.09
Group’s tax base also increased. The Company also recorded a higher tax expense in the separate financial statements this quarter from capital gains from the sale of MACO’s shares, which rose substantially
Depreciation and amortization 693 Work roll amortisation 76 Interest income (6) Finance costs 192 Doubtful debts expense from advance to suppliers 3 (Reversal of) loss on impairment expense of property, plant