Address fb sec.or.th Laws/Regulations Laws / Regulations Search Acts/Royal Enactments Securities and Exchange Act Derivatives Act Emergency Decree on Digital Asset Businesses Provident Fund Act Emergency
Address fb sec.or.th Laws/Regulations Laws / Regulations Search Acts/Royal Enactments Securities and Exchange Act Derivatives Act Emergency Decree on Digital Asset Businesses Provident Fund Act Emergency
Address fb sec.or.th Laws/Regulations Laws / Regulations Search Acts/Royal Enactments Securities and Exchange Act Derivatives Act Emergency Decree on Digital Asset Businesses Provident Fund Act Emergency
. Pongsak Lothongkam’s action constitutes an offense for buying securities while knowing or possessing inside information as specified in Section 242(1) in conjunction with Section 243(1), Section 243(2) and
rights in that meeting. The SEC considered the action as deprivation of shareholders? basic rights, affecting market confidence and international recognition of corporate governance of Thai listed
subsidiary and listed company, which was deemed dishonest act causing damage to GGC. They committed the offense with nine associates who were raw material distributors, namely (3) Anatta Green Co., Ltd
Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) and thus liable to penalties under Section 296 of the said Act. As the aiders, Ratchanee, Krisda, and Preecha are subject to penalties under Section 296 of the Act in
legal action taken under the SEA to the AMLO since the offences in this case also constitute a predicate offence under the Anti-Money Laundering Act B.E. 2542 (1999), as amended. Filing a criminal
Sections 89/24, 278, 281/10 in conjunction with Sections 300, 306, and 315 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) (as the case may be), the SEC therefore has filed a complaint against
such action. Athit’s acts are liable to operating securities business without license in contravention of Section 90, which is subject to the penalties under Section 289 of the Securities and Exchange