rules.  Bee was earlier found purchasing EIC shares through the Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET) at a price higher than the tender offer price. His action resulted in a violation of the tender offer rules

trading decisions on behalf of the clients, regardless of the client's permission or authorization. In this regard, {A}'s action was deemed as obtaining authorization from clients to make securities trading

pursue further action against the offeror and the financial advisor. # # #

clients who were his friends, while {A} took such orders without any written authorization from those 12 clients.{A}'s action was deemed failure to perform duties with responsibility and due care as the

construction projects, despite the fact that the services did not exist, with intent to deceive other persons. The said action was in violation of Section 312 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992

baht or 129.78 percent rise, and the average daily trading volume increased from 0.37 million to 4.33 million shares.Chayanont?s action caused the price and trading volume of CHUO shares during his

shares through such provided account, and obtained profit sharing according to the proportion invested among three of them.Choavalit?s action was in violation of Section 241 of the Securities and Exchange

December 27, 2012. It also revealed inappropriate action of a former capital market investment consultant of a securities company for trading derivatives on behalf of a client.The SEC found from its routine

client had ordered to sell 50,000 shares at 19 baht per share on February 25, 2014 but {A} instead submitted the selling orders for 49,000 shares at 17.50 baht per share. {A} admitted doing such action

of the SET?s action regarding rules on backdoor listing to protect shareholders and ensure the orderly market.