undertaking of securities business without having obtained a license under Section 90 and subject to penalties under Section 289 of the Securities and Exchange act B.E. 2535 (1992), namely an imprisonment

Corporation Public Company Limited (STARK), remains effective until the court orders otherwise pursuant to Section 267 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992). The extension of the asset attachment

taking an unfair advantage of other persons in violation of Section 241 and liable to the penalties under Section 296 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992.In this case, the offender refused to enter

the penalties under Section 296 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992). They all agreed to enter the criminal fining process.Consequently, Somporn was fined at the amount of 612,500 baht

the board of directors of listed companies is obligated to perform duties with care, responsibility and honesty in accordance with Section 89/7 of the Securities and Exchange Act, the SEC, by virtue of

referral from the Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET), irregularities were detected in relation to the trading activities of such shares by a certain group of persons. An SEC subsequent investigation revealed

report, the SEC probed into the case and found that the said companies and persons, without obtaining license under Section 90 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (SEA), jointly operated

Bangkok, July 20, 2015 ? The SEC takes further actions under the securities and exchange law after the Department of Business Development (DBD) clearly indicated that disallowing shareholders to

to the penalties under Section 296 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992. He was subject to a criminal fine penalty. Given that the benefit he had received was lower than the minimum fine of

matched to benefit the same persons, which is liable to contravention of Section 243 (1) (2) and Section 244 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992 and Sections 83 and 86 of the Criminal Code, as the