be liable to the penalty under Sections 312 and 315 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA), as the case may be. The said actions also caused damage to the company but brought about

operating the digital asset dealer business under Section 3 of the Emergency Decree on Digital Asset Businesses without license in violation of Section 26 and subject to the penalties under Section 66 of the

order or an action which results in the offence that the company operated digital asset exchange businesses without a license. The Court of Appeal adjudicated that the defendant was guilty under Section

Cannot be calculated as the Company does not issue securities for the payment of the transaction - The transaction size under the total consideration criterion gives the highest transaction value at 58.92

. Value of Issued Securities Cannot be calculated as the Company does not issue securities for the payment of the transaction - The transaction size under the total consideration criterion gives the highest

Company does not issue securities for the payment of the transaction - 4 The transaction size under the total consideration criterion gives the highest transaction value at 58.92 percent. Because the

the over-the-counter center is incorrect. If the cause of error resulting in the incorrect unit value under paragraph one hereof consequently affects the following calculation of the unit value, e.g

Thailand or the over-the-counter center is incorrect. If the cause of error resulting in the incorrect unit value under paragraph one hereof consequently affects the following calculation of the unit value

of Thailand or the over-the-counter center is incorrect. If the cause of error resulting in the incorrect unit value under paragraph one hereof consequently affects the following calculation of the

AS (“OKEA”), a company established under Norwegian law, which has developed and produced petroleum in Norway. The details of the transaction can be summarised as follows: 1. Date of an entry into of