and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992), Section 90 and subject to sanctions under Section 289. On October 3, 2018, the Bangkok South Criminal Court ruled against him for violating Sections 90 and 289 of the
Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992), Section 90 and subject to sanctions under Section 289. On October 3, 2018, the Bangkok South Criminal Court ruled against him for violating Sections 90 and 289 of
Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992), Section 90 and subject to sanctions under Section 289. On October 3, 2018, the Bangkok South Criminal Court ruled against him for violating Sections 90 and 289 of the SEC Act
and subject to sanctions under Section 289. This case is in the process of inquiry by the inquiry official of Economic Crime Suppression Division. SEC Act S.90 Criminal Complaint Filed with an
amendments have been proposed in parallel, such as pushing forward the civil sanctions for the consideration of National Legislative Assembly of Thailand. The proposed amendment of the Securities and Exchange
civil sanctions on Surin. However, he did not agree to comply with civil sanctions determined by the Civil Sanction Committee. SEC, therefore, requests the public prosecutor in writing to file a
244/3 (1)(2) in conjunction with Section 244/5 (4) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA), subject to the penalties under Section 296, Section 296/1, Section 296/2 and the civil
IFEC directors and executives is unlawful. If any fact appears that there has been any violation of the SEA, such persons may be liable to legal action that could lead to criminal penalties and civil
revealed to the public are liable to criminal sanctions. More severe penalties will be imposed in case the act is done with an aim to deceive investors or general public. The SEC thus urges executives and