Earlier, the Civil Sanction Committee resolved to impose civil sanctions on {A} for obstructing and not cooperating with other IFEC directors to set up board of directors meetings and a

were subject to civil sanctions under Section 296 of the SEA, as amended, too.   The Civil Sanction Committee has resolved to authorize SEC to initiate a civil sanction proceeding against Chantip

sanction proceedings against Apichart, Eng and Supanee requiring each offender to  pay civil monetary penalty, disgorge the benefits of loss avoided from committing the offenses, and reimburse the SEC’s

Earlier, the Civil Sanction Committee resolved to impose civil sanctions on Mr. Thanawat, who was IFEC director and executive at the time of the offence. He was ordered to pay a civil fine and

to bring the case against all offenders for the Civil Court to impose the highest civil sanction allowed by law in the form of civil penalty at the total amount of 2,303,065,651.33 million baht.The

under Section 296 and Section 296/2 of the SEA.The Civil Sanction Committee has decided to impose civil sanctions* on the three offenders above through the imposition of civil penalty, compensation at

wrongful acts against investors’ assets are liable to the highest sanction of revocation of approval for investment consultant for Complex Financial Products Type 2. However, the approval for Somchai as

civil sanctions under Section 317/4 and Section 317/5 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992), as amended by the Securities and Exchange Act (No. 5) B.E. 2559 (2016). The Civil Sanction

Earlier, the Civil Sanction Consideration Committee resolved to apply civil sanctions on Mr. Suphanan, an IFEC director and chief executive officer, and Mr. Thanawat Chansuwan, who was IFEC

has considered that Nattapong failed to perform duties with loyalty* by committing wrongful acts against the investors’ assets, which was an offense liable to revocation of approval as securities