to invest in the securities also exceeded the amount approved by GEN executive board, resulting the company to suffer a 265 million baht loss. Serious weakness in GEN?s internal control relating to the

accounting, to falsify documents about financial aid from Coke in order to record as revenue, resulting in increase of profits in the financial statements for the year 2002 of DAIDO. In addition, he colluded

DAIDO chairman, to falsify documents about financial aid from Coke in order to record as revenue, resulting in increase of profits in the financial statements for the year 2002 of DAIDO. In addition, he

specified period. On February 15, 2010, the Bangkok South Criminal Court sentenced the accused to pay a fine of Baht 60,000. Since the accused pled guilty, the Court reduced the fines by half, resulting in a

of prosecution date until the company so complies. Since the accused pled guilty, the Court reduced the fines by half, resulting in a fine of Baht 168,500 and a further fine of Baht 100 each day

. Since the accused pled guilty, the Court reduced the fines by half, resulting in a fine of 55,100 Baht. SEC Act S.56(2)(4) Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated 31/07/2013

day starting from the next day of prosecution date until the company so complies. Since the accused pled guilty, the Court reduced the fines by half, resulting in a fine of Baht 100,600 and a further

reduced the fines by half, resulting in a fine of Baht 118,500 and a further fine of Baht 150 each day starting from the next day of prosecution date until the company so complies. In addition to (1) the

starting from the next day of prosecution date until the company so complies. Since the accused pled guilty, the Court reduced the fines by half, resulting in a fine of Baht 118,500 and a further fine of

reduced the fines by half, resulting in a fine of Baht 100,600 and a further fine of Baht 200 each day starting from the next day of prosecution date until the company so complies. In addition to (1) the