Settled | Administrative Orders | Administrative Sanctions | Civil Action Relevant Informations > Criminal Sanction - annual Statistics > Administrative Sanction - annual statistics > Civil Sanction
? behalf. With the said authorization, he traded with high trading volume for a period of time. {A} admitted to Maybank Kim Eng Securities that he used clients' User IDs and passwords to send trading orders
orders sent through him for several days. {A} admitted that the securities trading orders were taken via mobile phone; the misconduct of which he had previously committed. In case of {B}, the SEC found
honesty by disguising that trading decisions were not actually made by clients; and receiving orders from persons not the owner of securities trading accounts. He was an employee of Tisco Securities Company
trading orders, trading securities on behalf of client and making trading decisions for benefit of client without the client?s orders.Following a complaint against {A} lodged by a client of KGI Securities
processing and confirming the redemption orders in violation of the tax terms; (2) In the case of {B}, she was found to sign the redemption orders without double-checking the correctness of
clients showed trading transactions made on a continual basis and in high volume but the source of orders was not found. Besides, {A} persuaded the clients to trade securities where he was the one
executed trading orders through the aforesaid trading accounts. {A} had denied all the accusations without adduced counter evidences. Later, she agreed to enter the settlement procedure and made the fine
personnel for 10 years. (2) {B} , an investor contact of KTB Securities Co., Ltd., aided other persons in sending trading orders of TRAF shares in a manipulative manner. She was fined for her assistance in
(“TCC”), namely TCC’s shares and the warrants to purchase the newly ordinary shares of TCC class 3, class 4, and class 5 (“TCC-W3” “TCC-W4” and “TCC-W5” respectively) by placing trading orders or trading