of the Securities and Exchange Commission No. KorNor. 2/2550 Re: Rules, Conditions and Procedures for Applying for Permission and Granting of Permission to Management Companies to Establish Branch

., for one-year eleven months and fourteen days. The period was set on the grounds of trading securities in the client?s account without permission, taking advantage of client by virtue of duty and

but with permission to provide services only to institutional investors. Its public solicitation was therefore considered unlicensed derivatives business. This case is under consideration of the public

Financial (NZ) Ltd. had been registered with the SEC as derivatives dealer but with permission to provide services only to institutional investors. Its public solicitation was therefore considered unlicensed

to order or act duty resulting in Beyond’s engagement in any other business which is not a licensed securities business without permission from the Capital Market Supervisory Boards approval which

Clause 15 or obtain an approval from mutual fund supervisor, or consent from clients or provident fund committee, as the case may be, in the case of as specified in Clause 16 or Clause 17. In this regard

resolution from unitholders in case of Clause 15 or obtain an approval from mutual fund supervisor, or consent from clients or provident fund committee, as the case may be, in the case of as specified in

scheme and prospectus or approved by the resolution from unitholders in case of Clause 15 or obtain an approval from mutual fund supervisor, or consent from clients or provident fund committee, as the case

No. TorThor. 45/2553 Re: Rules, Conditions and Procedures for Applying for Permission and Granting of Permission to Securities Company to Establish Branch Offices (No. 2) _____________ By virtue of

Court to grant a permission for the assessment of the value of mining property rights and thus could not disclose the information within the original deadline. EARTH has already requested a permission