trading orders when obtaining orders from clients. In this regard, the aforesaid actions are in violation of Clause 20(3) of the Notification of Capital Market Supervisory Board No. TorLorThor. 3/2555 re
into the trading. The actions of Sermkirt, Wichian and Pratheep were in violation of Sections 243(1) in conjunction with 244 and 243(2) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) in conjunction
orders and payment. The said actions were in violation of Section 241 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992). As they agreed to enter the settlement procedure, the Settlement Committee
said actions were in violation of Section 241 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992). As they agreed to enter the settlement procedure, the Settlement Committee therefore imposed fines on {A
down the business or delist SPSU shares from the SET. Later, SPI launched a tender offer to purchase SPSU shares at the price higher than the market price during such period. The said actions were in
decoration equipment from Budget Ltd. and New Tique Ltd. to conceal expenses. It led to decrease of loss in the financial statements for Q1-Q2/2003 of DAIDO. Such actions misled DAIDO’s shareholders or any
the penalty under Sections 312 and 315 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA), as the case may be. The said actions also caused damage to the company but brought about benefits to Mr
inconsistency with normal market condition. In the scheme, Mr. Sun Dongvanpakdee and three other persons who entered the settlement procedure on January 22, 2014 aided or abetted the aforesaid actions by allowing