? futures trading orders through an account linked to him at another broker for his personal gain. This caused financial damages to his clients. His actions were in violation of Sections 145(3) and (4) of
Company Limited (“BAY”). Being the person responsible for BAY’s operations, she failed to issue orders or omitted to perform her duties as required. This pertains to the case where BAY, acting as the
operations of JKN at the time of the incident. He failed to issue orders or take actions that were his duty to perform in the case where JKN, as a listed company, was obligated to disclose documents or
Contacts Public Company Limited (OTO)(current name: Peer for You Public Company Limited (PEER)) shares with aided and abetted of (18) Mr. Chaiwat Phithakraktham to commit such offense. Consequently, their
Contacts Public Company Limited (OTO)(current name: Peer for You Public Company Limited (PEER)) shares with aided and abetted of (18) Mr. Chaiwat Phithakraktham to commit such offense. Consequently, their
Public Company Limited (OTO)(current name: Peer for You Public Company Limited (PEER)) shares with aided and abetted of (18) Mr. Chaiwat Phithakraktham to commit such offense. Consequently, their actions
Contacts Public Company Limited (OTO)(current name: Peer for You Public Company Limited (PEER)) shares with aided and abetted of (18) Mr. Chaiwat Phithakraktham to commit such offense. Consequently, their
Contacts Public Company Limited (OTO)(current name: Peer for You Public Company Limited (PEER)) shares with aided and abetted of (18) Mr. Chaiwat Phithakraktham to commit such offense. Consequently, their
Public Company Limited (OTO)(current name: Peer for You Public Company Limited (PEER)) shares with aided and abetted of (18) Mr. Chaiwat Phithakraktham to commit such offense. Consequently, their actions
and/or trading volume of One to One Contacts Public Company Limited (OTO)(current name: Peer for You Public Company Limited (PEER)) shares with aided and abetted of (18) Mr. Chaiwat Phithakraktham to