criminal complaint in the STARK case, namely: (1) STARK, (2) Mr. Chanin Yensudchai, (3) Mr. Vonnarat Tangkaravakoon, (4) Mr. Chinawat Assavapokee, (5) Mr. Sathar Chantrasettalead, (6) Mr. Kittisak

have been imposed with a criminal complaint and subsequently an asset attachment in the case of Stark Corporation Public Company Limited (STARK). The seven entities are: (1) STARK, (2) Mr. Vonnarat

therefore reviewed the regulations regarding the operational guidelines for AMCs in case of incorrect pricing. This is to provide AMCs with greater flexibility in fund management, while ensuring that

, Visanu and Nontawat as well as their close associates benefited from the sale money of the hotel.  In addition, during the process of clarification to the SEC regarding the case above, the four directors

-money Laundering Act B.E. 2542, as amended. In any case, filing a criminal complaint is mere commencement of the criminal procedures whereby the consideration of whether any person is guilty is subject

incurred by the SEC), a suspension of trading in securities or entering into derivatives contracts for a period of 14 or 30 months  (as the case may be) and a bar from serving as directors or executives in

The SEC Civil Sanction Committee (CSC) had earlier resolved to impose civil sanctions on all four offenders of this case, among which only two agreed to comply with the specified civil sanctions

Reporting Person : - | Type of securities : - | Date of reporting obligation : 22/01/2014

Reporting Person : - | Type of securities : - | Date of reporting obligation : 19/02/2014

Reporting Person : - | Type of securities : - | Date of reporting obligation : 20/02/2014