statements for the year 2002 and for the 1st and 2nd quarters of 2003 and thus misled shareholders and investors about DAIDO?s true financial condition. The said actions were in contravention of Section 312 of
prices, while Prayuth and Naruephol used their own accounts to manipulate the SECC share. Porntep?s and Arada?s actions were liable to contravention of Section 243(1) in conjunction with Section 244 and
, before TKN disclosed this inside information to the SET on 10 November 2022. The actions of Mr. Itthipat and Mr. Nutchatpong in the TKN insider trading case constitute an offense under Section 242
(before the fifth amendment) Section 241 Civil Action Dated 01/04/2020
; - a reimbursement of investigative expenses in an amount of 230,682.00 Baht SEC Act (the fifth amendment) Section 242 (1) Civil Action Dated 19/11/2024
), misappropriated PPPC's money to invest in and pay off debts of the companies over which he had full control for his own benefit, causing damage to PPPC's property, violating Section 307, 308 & 311
in the Stock Exchange of Thailand under the name of "Bill Trade" without proper licenses granted, violating Section 90. On February 9, 2011, the court sentenced the accused to a fine of
securities in Thailand under the name of "Chartered Asset Management" and "Bowen Reece" without proper licenses granted, violating Section 90. The public prosecutor issued a prosecution