public offering of securities without the effective registration statement and the draft prospectus from the SEC Office in violation of Section 65 and subject to sanctions under Section 276 of the
committing unlicensed digital asset exchange offense. On March 7, 2024, the Criminal Court ruled against the accused for violating Section 3, 26 and 66 of the Emergency Decree on Digital Asset Businesses B.E
. Sakesan Baisak (5) Mr. Suriyan Thongpikul and (6) Colonel Kanayos Suksanguan failed to provide explanation to questions stated in SEC letter, in which, the SEC exercised the power under Section 58(2) of The
. Sakesan Baisak (5) Mr. Yosapong Pothasuthon and (6) Colonel Kanayos Suksanguan failed to provide explanation to questions stated in SEC letter, in which, the SEC exercised the power under Section 58(2) of
. Sakesan Baisak (5) Mr. Yosapong Pothasuthon and (6) Mr. Suriyan Thongpikul failed to provide explanation to questions stated in SEC letter, in which, the SEC exercised the power under Section 58(2) of The
=searchcontent_th~5^10000&ps=2&mm=100&qf=title_th_default&fq=key_filetype%3Adoc&start=0&rows=10 1 - 10 of 20 results Sort by: Relevance Date (Newest) Date (Oldest) Section 96 of the following manners, for which the
company for 5 years, and as major shareholder of derivatives business operator for 10 years. Due to the deficiencies in duty performance of Mr. King, SKFM was subject to violation of Section 117
of Section 243(1)(2) and Section 244 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992 (SEA) in conjunction with Section 83 and Section 86 of the Penal Code, and liable to the penalties under Section 296 of
violating Sections 307, 308, 311 in conjunction with Section 313, and Section 312(2)(3) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA). He was sentenced to serve 8-year imprisonment for corporate