? trading values and volumes and lure the general public to trade such shares.The aforesaid actions were deemed manipulation of TYM share price in violation of Sections 243(1) in conjunction with 244 and 243
another person. Then, the shares were resold to ZMICO at 19.75 baht per share which was not the normal market price. Later, the public prosecutor issued a prosecution order and filed a lawsuit against
trading behavior of retail investors tended to be regarded noise trader, this research paper brought about new conclusion that all types of investors in the SET were informed traders. In term of investment
auditors were unable to express opinions due to limitation on scope of audit imposed by the companies? managements. AIE and AI must submit to the SEC and publicly disclose the rectified and audited 2014
caused TYM share price inconsistent with normal market conditions to mislead the general public about TYM trading values and volumes and lure the general public to trade such shares.Their actions were
trigger for a mandatory tender offer of the total NMG shares sold. In so doing, they failed to report their acquisitions, and did not make the tender offer for NMG takeover.As a result, their actions were
consultant to do so. Auracha's actions were deemed as (1) failure to perform duties or provide services honestly, (2) misconduct upon the client's asset, (3) use of the client's trading account to trade
was no evidence that the client had ordered the responsible investment consultant to do so. Auracha?s actions were deemed as (1) failure to perform duties or provide services honestly, (2) misconduct
trading period to be inconsistent with normal market conditions to mislead other persons that CHUO shares were in high demand at the time and lure them to trade such shares accordingly. His offense was in
normal market condition became affected during 9 January - 28 February 2013.Such offences were in violation of Section 243 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992 (SEA) in conjunction with Section 83