orders sent through him for several days. {A} admitted that the securities trading orders were taken via mobile phone; the misconduct of which he had previously committed. In case of {B}, the SEC found
to order or act where he has the duty, resulted in the offence committed by Zipmex concerning the case that during May 8, 2022, to July 20, 2022, Zipmex induced its own customers to deploy ZipUp
, Chupong was deemed to have performed duties dishonestly. In this regard, Chupong, were deemed to have committed offences in violation Section 311 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992 (SEA), and
disclosed to the public. Mrs. Usuma and Miss Thitirat rendered assistance to his commission of the offense. 31/10/2023 The Civil Court delivered a judgement that the defendant had committed an offense
defendant had committed an offense under the lawsuit of the plaintiff, and imposed a civil penalty in amount of 333,333.33 Baht. Moreover, the court ordered the defendants to jointly reimburse court fees to
a judgement that the defendant had committed an offense under the lawsuit of the plaintiff, and imposed a civil penalty in amount of 333,333.33 Baht. Moreover, the court ordered the defendants to
subsidiary of KC, namely (1) Mr. Kittisan Mookdee, (2) Mr. Teerasit Sangngern and (3) Mr. Sunchai Intarauksorn jointly failed to perform their duties with dishonest intent, committed dishonest converting KC’s
a subsidiary of KC, namely (1) Mr. Kittisan Mookdee, (2) Mr. Teerasit Sangngern and (3) Mr. Sunchai Intarauksorn jointly failed to perform their duties with dishonest intent, committed dishonest