Income attributable to Owners of the Parent7 177.7 695.3 -74.4% 396.8 965.1 -58.9% Key Profitability Ratio: Gross Profit Margin 29.4% 40.4% 30.6% 40.1% Net Profit Margin8 36.0% 67.1% 25.8% 61.2% 1
1,966 million for 9M’2016 to Baht 2,346 million for 9M’2017, primarily due to the improvement of our operating profit margin and the reduction of financing cost resulting from the repayment of loan after
investments Table 4: Key Financial Ratios 1Q 4Q 1Q YoY QoQ 2017 2017 2018 Profitability Ratio Gross profit margin (%) 52% 48% 50% (2%) 2% Rent and services 53% 49% 51% (2%) 3% Real estate sales 0% 0% 38% 38% 38
Profitability Ratio Gross profit margin (%) 50% 50% 48% (2%) (2%) 51% 49% (2%) Rent and services 51% 51% 50% (1%) (1%) 52% 51% (1%) Hotel operations 68% 72% 69% 2% (3%) 69% 71% 1% Food and beverages 23% 23% 22
, AIS reported a net profit of Bt30,077mn, a slight decline of 1.9% YoY, or a net profit margin of 19.1%. It is to be noted that due to the tax incentive programs in 2016 and 2017 with the benefits to be
statements The net profit and net profit margin of the Company and subsidiary companies decrease 5.34% and 0.81% respectively. The income recognition of three projects completed in Q1/2018 accounts for 32% of
, representing a decrease from the end of the previous year by Baht 1,472 Million. Significant Financial Ratios* For the first quarter of the year 2018, the Company had Net Profit Margin ratio at 18.65 percent
QoQ comparison showed a 56% drop as that of 4Q17 incorporated profit of a non-recurring income from the recognition of the upfront lease payment of Singha Complex, as mentioned previously. Profit margin
reason was the lower average selling price due to fewer big projects & price competition while the prices of plastic raisin rose, and then caused lower gross profit margin. WIIK
energy projects. In 2019, SAAM Group’s gross profit amounted to THB 52.78 million, representing gross profit margin of 73.50%, a THB 1.85 million or 3.62% increase from the previous year (in 2018: THB