Different form the Board of Directors’ Opinion None 2. Details of Nam San 3B Project and Investment in the Transmission Line System 2.1. Transaction Date The Board of Directors’ meeting of BCPG No. 2/2020
different from the future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. These forward- looking statements are based on numerous assumptions regarding the
achievements of the Company to be materially different from the future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. These forward- looking statements are based on
3.54 Cost per ASK excluding fuel cost 3.14 2.79 RASK – CASK 0.02 0.35 Remarks (1) These figures are different from those included in Company’s consolidated Financial Statements as they include revenues
different from the opinion of the Board under Clause 11 All directors of the Company have the same opinions as specified in the above Board of Directors’resolution (unanimous) and no audit committee member
approve the sale of ordinary shares of RPV equivalent to 100 percent of the total registered capital. 10. Opinion of the Company’s Audit Committee and/or Director which is different from the Opinion of the
legislation under which the issuer operates, its country of incorporation and the address and telephone number of its registered office (or principal place of business if different from 5 its registered
increased due to the acquisition of Saraburi Quicklime however Capex was kept in line with forecasts which is a major improvement year on year. Capex discipline is a key focus area and in 2019 capital
expansion plan to increase the service area and create a referral network to various regions. The Company aims to grow in revenue at the growth rate of 10 - 15 percent per year with proper profitability ratio
Agency (ARENA) for AUD 9.50 million. The Project is developed on the area of the already closed coal mine at the north of Queensland, Australia. The Project Cost is approximately AUD 95 million. The