Department after the Central Bankruptcy Court had ordered POLAR to be placed under absolute receivership. The  receiver then decided that the five directors were no longer qualified as company directors

for the client in acquiring KARAT?s shares from its major shareholder and launching a tender offer to delist KARAT from the Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET), before the information was disclosed to the

affect POLAR investors and shareholders. In this regard, POLAR's failure to comply with the order of the SEC is liable to contravention of Section 58 (3) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992

Bangkok, August 19, 2011 ? Vasant Thienhom, SEC Deputy Secretary-General stated concerning the Appeal Court?s today judgment that overturned the Court of First Instance on December 3, 2007 that

 {X1} Company shares in his own securities trading account by using the aforementioned information learnt during his directorship in {X1} Company. {A} and {B}'s actions were in violation of Section 241

Bangkok, July 14, 2014 ? The SEC is seeking public comment on the draft regulations to be issued under Section 315/1 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) on payment of bounty and

the aforementioned information learnt from her position of TUCC chief finance officer. Yongyuth and Vorapin?s actions were in violation of Section 241 which is subject to sanctions under Section 296 of

quarter during the past three years (2007-2009). {A} had access to this inside information by virtue of his position as a {X1} director at that time.{A}' s action was deemed the violation of Section 241 of

. (IT).With the referral from the Stock Exchange of Thailand, the SEC?s probe found that during January 31 - February 4, 2013, Pantipa, IT financial controller, had sold 374,440 IT shares through

Limited (ESTAR) for insider trading.With the referral from the Stock Exchange of Thailand, the SEC probed into the case and found that during February 24-28, 2014, Ratanachai had used another person?s