result, the price and trading volume of PICO’s shares were not in a normal market condition, and investors in general were misled to understand that a large number of investors were interested in buying

being traded in great volume and the price was changing inconsistently with normal market conditions, to lure the public into trading such shares.   Somchai?s offense was in violation of Section 243 (1

in great volume or the price of such securities had changed or had not changed that was not consistent with the normal conditions, and such trading was made to lure other investors to purchase or sell

in great volume or the price of such securities had changed or had not changed that was not consistent with the normal conditions, and such trading was made to lure other investors to purchase or sell

in great volume or the price of such securities had changed or had not changed that was not consistent with the normal conditions, and such trading was made to lure other investors to purchase or sell

volume or the price of such securities had changed or had not changed that was not consistent with the normal conditions, and such trading was made to lure other investors to purchase or sell ABC shares

volume or the price of such securities had changed or had not changed that was not consistent with the normal conditions, and such trading was made to lure other investors to purchase or sell ABC shares

in great volume or the price of such securities had changed or had not changed that was not consistent with the normal conditions, and such trading was made to lure other investors to purchase or sell

in great volume or the price of such securities had changed or had not changed that was not consistent with the normal conditions, and such trading was made to lure other investors to purchase or sell

. Furthermore, these transactions misled other persons to into thinking that these securities were traded in significant volume and lured others to participate in the trading. This case is in the process of