constituted public frauds contravening Section 343 and 83 of the Penal Code. Furthermore, the operation violated Emergency Decree Governing Fraudulent Borrowing B.E.2547 (2004). The statute of limitations ran
Section 343 and 83 of the Penal Code. Furthermore, the operation violated Emergency Decree Governing Fraudulent Borrowing B.E.2547 (2004). The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order against the
contravening Section 343 and 83 of the Penal Code. Furthermore, the operation violated Emergency Decree Governing Fraudulent Borrowing B.E.2547 (2004). The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order against
Section 343 and 83 of the Penal Code. Furthermore, the operation violated Emergency Decree Governing Fraudulent Borrowing B.E.2547 (2004). The Criminal Court dismissed the case. DV Act S.16 and Section
contravening Section 343 and 83 of the Penal Code. Furthermore, the operation violated Emergency Decree Governing Fraudulent Borrowing B.E.2547 (2004). The Criminal Court dismissed the case. DV Act S.16 and
Code, as the case may be. The SEC has therefore filed the criminal complaint against the individuals with the DSI for consideration of further legal proceedings. In addition, the SEC has reported this
Following a referral from the Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET) in August 2016 and the SEC’s further investigation, it was found that Mrs. Vally Sungsiri and Miss Sunisa Chutinaton conspired together
Group Public Company Limited (TOG). The offenders paid civil penalties and compensation for the received benefit, at the total amount of 4.83 million baht. According to the referral from the Stock