Novermber at 17.41 hours (after SET closing). His misconduct was in violation of Section 241 and liable to the penalties under Section 296 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992).
lawsuit to a civil court SEC Act (before the fifth amendment) Section 241 in conjunction with Section 86 of the Penal Code Civil Action Dated 24/10/2017
JAS stock noticeably increased and Mr. Soraj gained undue benefits from selling the JASH16 Futures he had bought. SEC Act S.89/7 and Section 89/10 and Section 89/11 Settlement Committee Meeting No
-General of DSI’s conflicting opinion on additional charges under Section 307, 308, 309, 311, 313 and 315 of the Securities and Exchange Act and under Section 264 and 268 of the Penal Code, and on the
Director-General of DSI’s conflicting opinion on additional charges under Section 307, 308, 309, 311, 313 and 315 of the Securities and Exchange Act and under Section 264 and 268 of the Penal Code, and on
for the year 2012 (Form 56-1) to the SEC and the SET within the specified period. On March 26, 2014, the Bangkok South Criminal Court ruled against the accused for violating Section 56 and Section 274
, Their action were deemed a violation of Section 312 of the SEA. Moreover, their actions were also considered as syphoning TUCC money for the benefits of themselves and others in violation of Sections 307
action were deemed a violation of Section 312 of the SEA. Moreover, their actions were also considered as syphoning TUCC money for the benefits of themselves and others in violation of Sections 307, 308