working for Asia Plus Securities Co., Ltd. at the time of misconduct.Following the inspection report submitted by Asia Plus Securities and the subsequent examination conducted by the SEC, it was found that
trading decisions for the client. From examination of communications records, there was no sources of the orders; just transaction confirmations made by such investment consultant and the conversations
for such trading was made from the client account by {A} without the knowledge of the client.The {B} case was also lodged by an investor. The SEC's finding from an examination of conversation records
; assets to SEC with information that did not align with the facts found by the SEC's examination. This resulted in the consideration that Mr. Akalarp committed or permitted Zipmex Thailand to make
, exchange traded fund (ETF), property funds, structured notes and other debt securities; (c) Relevant knowledge on accounting, finance and tax such as accounting standards; (d) Knowledge on assessment or
traded fund (ETF), property funds, structured notes and other debt securities; (c) Relevant knowledge on accounting, finance and tax such as accounting standards; (d) Knowledge on assessment or analysis of
public by such securities companies and derivatives broker. In this regard, the SEC Thailand assumes no responsibility for verification, examination or certification of completeness, accuracy and update of
information recording system with respect to derivatives trading, especially pre-trade information and post-trade information in order to support monitoring and examination after derivatives trading (audit
The SEC’s examination of facts in this case has led to the consideration that Zipmex disseminated or certified information that were potentially misleading in substance regarding digital asset