. 2546 (2003), Section 16 and subject to sanctions under Section 125. On April 8, 2021, the Criminal Court sentenced the accused 1-year imprisonment and 1,000,000 Baht fine. Since the accused pleaded
Ms. Sa-ngiam Pimkotr Ms. Sa-ngiam Pimkotr failed to comply with the competent officer's order to testify. The Pathumwan District Court sentenced the accused to three-month imprisonment and a
Ms. Somboon Pangphet Ms. Somboon Pangphet failed to comply with the competent officer's order to testify. The Pathumwan District Court sentenced the accused to three-month imprisonment and a
Mr. Chusak Ruentip Mr. Chusak Ruentip failed to comply with the competent officer's order. The Court sentenced the accused to 15-day imprisonment and a fine of Baht 2,000. The jail term, however
Mr. Chusak Ruentip Mr. Chusak Ruentip failed to comply with the competent officer's order to testify. The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order against the accused; however, attempt to
(Form 56-2, 2020) to the SEC within the specified period. In case of the audited financial statements for the year 2020, the Criminal Court sentenced the accused to pay a fine of 10,000 Baht and a further
committing unlicensed digital asset exchange offense. On March 7, 2024, the Criminal Court ruled against the accused for violating Section 3, 26 and 66 of the Emergency Decree on Digital Asset Businesses B.E
) MD&A of Q1/2020 (7) the annual registration statement for the year 2019 (Form 56-1) (8) the annual report for the year 2019 (Form 56-2). The Criminal Court sentenced the accused to pay a fine of
, contravening Section 343 of the Penal Code. On September 27, 2017, The Supreme Court ruled that the accused operated unlicensed securities business in the name of BENSON DUPONT in violating section 90 of SEA and