. Her action was deemed failure to perform duty with responsibility, due care, and loyalty for the best interest of the company, which was a violation of Section 89/7 of the SEA. This case is under
authorized director, causing the company to suffer losses. His action was deemed failure to perform duty with responsibility, due care, and loyalty for the best interest of the company, which was a violation
prosecutor issued a non-prosecution order. The case was deemed final. SEC Act S.243(2) in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated 21/03/2011
lure the investing public into their businesses. The aforesaid act was deemed undertaking derivatives business without license in contravention of Section 16 of the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (2003). This
entries were found in the financial statements: year 2008, Q1/2009, Q2/2009, Q3/2009 and year 2009. The public prosecutor issued a non-prosecution order. The case was deemed final. SEC Act S.312 Criminal
performance of the company. The said entries were found in the financial statements: year 2008, Q1/2009, Q2/2009, Q3/2009 and year 2009. The public prosecutor issued a non-prosecution order. The case was deemed
year 2009. The public prosecutor issued a non-prosecution order. The case was deemed final. SEC Act S.312 Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated 24/06/2015
2009. The public prosecutor issued a non-prosecution order. The case was deemed final. SEC Act S.312 Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated 24/06/2015