/2551 Re: Securities and Derivatives Trading for Derivatives Broker _____________ By virtue of Section 18 of the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (2003) as amended by the Derivatives Act (No. 2) B.E. 2551 (2008
Capital Market Supervisory Board No. TorThor. 2/2551 Re: Securities and Derivatives Trading for Derivatives Broker _____________ By virtue of Section 18 of the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (2003) as amended by
Board No. TorThor/Nor/Khor. 58/2552 Re: Qualifications and Other Prohibited Characteristics of Directors and Executives of Securities Companies (Codified) By virtue of Section 16/6 of the Securities and
Exchange Commission No. Kor Thor. 25/2560 Re: Specification of Paid-up Registered Capital of Securities Business License Applicant and Licensee By virtue of Section 14 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E
digital asset investments, liable to be an offense under Section 40 of the Emergency Decree on Digital Asset Businesses B.E. 2561 (2018).The case of Zipmex director and CEO Akalarp Yimwilai was an offense
statements. As the acts of the 10 offenders mentioned above are considered contravention of Section 312 and Section 281/2, paragraph 2, in conjunction with Section 89/7 and 89/7 in conjunction with
Section 90 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) which states that no person shall undertake securities business without license. Violator of Section 90 is subject to penalties under
Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992), as amended (SEA), as follows: Apichart’s acts violated Section 242 (1), Eng’s acts violated Sections 242 (2) and 315, and Supanee’s acts violated Section 242 (1
the inside information were liable to violation of Section 241 of the Securities and Exchange Act (SEA) B.E. 2535. Meanwhile, Somsak and Areeya, as aiders and abettors of Pittaya and Athueck, were in