lawsuit to a civil court SEC Act (before the fifth amendment) Section 241 in conjunction with Section 86 of the Penal Code Civil Action Dated 24/10/2017
JAS stock noticeably increased and Mr. Soraj gained undue benefits from selling the JASH16 Futures he had bought. SEC Act S.89/7 and Section 89/10 and Section 89/11 Settlement Committee Meeting No
-General of DSI’s conflicting opinion on additional charges under Section 307, 308, 309, 311, 313 and 315 of the Securities and Exchange Act and under Section 264 and 268 of the Penal Code, and on the
Director-General of DSI’s conflicting opinion on additional charges under Section 307, 308, 309, 311, 313 and 315 of the Securities and Exchange Act and under Section 264 and 268 of the Penal Code, and on
for the year 2012 (Form 56-1) to the SEC and the SET within the specified period. On March 26, 2014, the Bangkok South Criminal Court ruled against the accused for violating Section 56 and Section 274
, Their action were deemed a violation of Section 312 of the SEA. Moreover, their actions were also considered as syphoning TUCC money for the benefits of themselves and others in violation of Sections 307
action were deemed a violation of Section 312 of the SEA. Moreover, their actions were also considered as syphoning TUCC money for the benefits of themselves and others in violation of Sections 307, 308
. SEC Act S.89/7 and Section 281/2 paragraph 2 and Section 307 308 311 312 and 83 of Criminal Code Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated 20/04/2017