performance of the company. The said entries were found in the financial statements: year 2008, Q1/2009, Q2/2009, Q3/2009 and year 2009. The public prosecutor issued a non-prosecution order. The case was deemed

materially lower than the actual value to deceive any persons about financial condition and performance of the company. The said entries were found in the financial statements: Q1/2009, Q2/2009, Q3/2009 and

lower than the actual value to deceive any persons about financial condition and performance of the company. The said entries were found in the financial statements: Q1/2009, Q2/2009, Q3/2009 and year

in a fine of Baht 323,250 and a further fine of Baht 750 each day starting from the next day of prosecution date (March 2, 2016) until the company so complies. SEC Act S.56 and 199 Criminal

reduced the fines by half, resulting in a fine of Baht 563,000 and a further fine of Baht 500 each day starting from the next day of prosecution date (March 2, 2016) until the company so complies. SEC

date until the company so complies. Since the accused pled guilty, the Court reduced the fines by half, resulting in a fine of Baht 563,000 and a further fine of Baht 500 each day starting from the next

for different clients’s profiles via three websites: www.giltedgeintl.com www.on-t3-line.com and www.online-t3.com In case, none of the aforementioned entities had been licensed to operate securities

and long-term returns. This case is in the process of inquiry by the inquiry official. SEC Act S.301 Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated 21/03/2016

long-term returns. This case is in the process of inquiry by the inquiry official. SEC Act S.301 Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated 21/03/2016

(Form 56-1, 2015), the annual report for the year 2015 (Form 56-2, 2015) in accordance with the specified rules; and has failed to submit the reviewed financial statement for Q1/2016, the reviewed