conditions.  The three persons? offences were in violation of Section 243(1)(2) in conjunction with Section 244, and liable to the punishments under Section 296 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535

’ list and then may exercise the right to appeal such DBD’s decision.According to Section 42 of the Administrative Procedure Act B.E. 2539 (1996), an administrative order shall be effective since the

that  he continued to submit trading orders in the same manner. The act of Surin constituted a violation of Section 244/3 and will be subject to punishment under Section 296, Section 296/1, and

Bangkok, September 11, 2014 ?The SEC is seeking public comment on draft regulations on termination of listed company?s duty to disclose information under  Section 56 and duty of directors and

Bangkok, 14 September 2016 ? The SEC has filed a criminal complaint with the Department of Special Investigation (DSI) against (1) Mr. Siwasit Sainumphung (2) Ms. Noppawan Suwan, and (3) Mr. Viroj

information, {A} purchased 10,000 JASH16 Futures contracts whose underlying was the JAS stock before attending the Board?s meeting. JAS later disclosed the information on such dividend payment to the SET. The

, Pongsachalerm and Chaiwat?s actions were deemed using inside information to gain unfair benefits over other persons in contravention of Section 241 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992 and thus liable to

in benefits from trading of KARAT shares. Apichart?s actions were deemed using inside information to gain unfair benefits over other persons in contravention of Section 241 of the Securities and

complaint filed with the Department of Special Investigation on September 9, 2014. They traded UKEM shares in concealment on a continual basis, inflated and stabilized share price, and matched orders within

statements for the year 2002 and for the 1st and 2nd quarters of 2003 and thus misled shareholders and investors about DAIDO?s true financial condition. The said actions were in contravention of Section 312 of