Court ruled against the accused for violating Section 56, Section 274 paragraph 1, and Section 300 of the SEA. As the accused committed the several distinct and different offences, the Court inflicted the
POWER-P Plc. (POWER), for violating Sections 307, 311 and 312 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) by collusively falsifying POWER accounts worth totaling 34 million baht with
Natchaporn or Rassarin) were guilty for violating Sections 307, 308 and 311 (1) (2) (3) of the SEA and Sections 264 and 268 in conjunction with Sections 83 and 86 of the Penal Code while Budget Management and
violating multiple legal provisions. Pursuant to Section 90 of the Criminal Code, the penalty shall be imposed under the provision carrying the heaviest punishment, namely, the offense of operating a digital
imprisonment for violating Section 312 of the SEA for permitting false records or no record of important information in POWER-P’s 2005 financial statements and documents, as well as incomplete, incorrect and
in the first paragraph of Section 281/2 of the SEA. The Supreme Court sentenced the accused to 1-year imprisonment and pay a total fine of Baht 1,000,000 for violating Sections 281/2 paragraph 2 of the
, the SEC probed into the case and found that he was guilty.Yesterday (August 7, 2012), the Criminal Court ruled against him for violating Sections 281/2, 307, 308, 311, 312, and 313 of the SEA. As he had
), misappropriated PPPC's money to invest in and pay off debts of the companies over which he had full control for his own benefit, causing damage to PPPC's property, violating Section 307, 308 & 311 http
FOCUS share price. Her jail term, however, was suspended for two years.Yesterday (October 31, 2012), the Criminal Court ruled against two share price manipulators for violating Section 243(1), (2) in
digital asset dealer business under Section 3 of the Emergency Decree. However, Exmix carried out such activities without obtaining the required licenses, thereby violating Section 26 and being subject to