this regard, since the offenses relating to unfair securities and derivatives trading practices also constitute a predicate offense under the Anti-Money Laundering Act B.E. 2542 (1999) and related
securities companies. In this regard, since the offenses relating to unfair securities trading practices are also listed as a predicate offense under the Anti-Money Laundering Act B.E. 2542 (1999), the SEC has
unlicensed business operators at the exhibition. Failure to cooperate could lead to being considered as a supporter to commission of offenses. Concurrently, the SEC urges the public and investors to exercise
by Noppawan and Viroj who allowed their separate trading accounts to be used for the YCI transactions in exchange for compensation.The aforesaid offenses were in violation of Section 243 of the
intention to conceal the fact and fabricating false evidence. She was employed by Phillip Securities (Thailand) Public Company Limited at the time of committing such offenses. Following a referral from
could influence the securities price to gain unfair benefit over other persons, liable to the offenses under Section 241 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) and criminal penalties under
in such a way that the receiver of the benefits from such trading is the same person. These offenses were in violation of Sections 243 and 244 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992 (SEA) in
director of the company purchasing the NUSA condominium units, assisted persons under (1) – (4) in committing the offenses. The SEC’s findings revealed that the deposit for the purchase of the hotel above