could influence the securities price to gain unfair benefit over other persons, liable to the offenses under Section 241 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) and criminal penalties under
in such a way that the receiver of the benefits from such trading is the same person. These offenses were in violation of Sections 243 and 244 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992 (SEA) in
director of the company purchasing the NUSA condominium units, assisted persons under (1) – (4) in committing the offenses. The SEC’s findings revealed that the deposit for the purchase of the hotel above
director of the company purchasing the NUSA condominium units, assisted persons under (1) – (4) in committing the offenses. The SEC’s findings revealed that the deposit for the purchase of the hotel above
director of the company purchasing the NUSA condominium units, assisted persons under (1) – (4) in committing the offenses. The SEC’s findings revealed that the deposit for the purchase of the hotel above
director of the company purchasing the NUSA condominium units, assisted persons under (1) – (4) in committing the offenses. The SEC’s findings revealed that the deposit for the purchase of the hotel above
director of the company purchasing the NUSA condominium units, assisted persons under (1) – (4) in committing the offenses. The SEC’s findings revealed that the deposit for the purchase of the hotel above
director of the company purchasing the NUSA condominium units, assisted persons under (1) – (4) in committing the offenses. The SEC’s findings revealed that the deposit for the purchase of the hotel above
sanctions, which must not be lower than those specified by the CSC. In all cases, civil penalties and compensation for the benefits received or would have been received from committing offenses shall be
Panacee, and (6) Mrs. Chomsuda Rungruangnavarat, an authorized director of the company purchasing the NUSA condominium units, assisted persons under (1) – (4) in committing the offenses. The SEC’s findings