pay an equal civil penalty of 333,333.33 baht. In addition, since the offenses in this case are related to unfair trading activity, which is a predicate offense under the Anti-Money Laundering Act B.E

subject to pay an equal civil penalty of 333,333.33 baht. In addition, since the offenses in this case are related to unfair trading activity, which is a predicate offense under the Anti-Money Laundering

further action within its authority, as the unfair securities trading misconduct constitutes a predicate offense under the Anti-Money Laundering Act B.E. 2542 (1999).Note:* SEC News No. 320/2025 dated 12

associated with illegal acts, as such acts may constitute predicate offenses under multiple laws. Accordingly, the SEC and the CIB have exchanged information and worked in close coordination, contributing to

to the Anti-money Laundering Office (AMLO) for consideration of actions within their authority as the offenses in this case constitute predicate offenses under the Anti-Money Laundering Act B.E. 2542

Office (AMLO) for further consideration of actions under their authority as the offenses related to unfair securities trading constitute a predicate offense under the Anti-Money Laundering Act B.E. 2542

notified the legal action under the Securities and Exchange Act to the Anti-money Laundering Office as the persons’ acts are also a predicate offense under the Anti-money Laundering Act B.E. 2542 (1999

notified the filing of such criminal complaint to the Anti-money Laundering Office (AMLO) because the offense of manipulating price and volume of securities is deemed as a predicate offense under the Anti

unfair securities trading practices are also listed as a predicate offense under the Anti-Money Laundering Act B.E. 2542 (1999), the SEC has reported the case to the AMLO for consideration of further

the unfair securities trading misconduct constitutes a predicate offense under the Anti-Money Laundering Act B.E. 2542 (1999).Note:* SEC News No. 334/2025 dated 25 December 2025 “SEC imposes civil