regarding securities trading. The case was subject to a civil sanction, was filed with the Civil Court, and was the first legal case adjudged by the Court’s final decision. The whole process, from the

Bangkok, August 19, 2011 ? Vasant Thienhom, SEC Deputy Secretary-General stated concerning the Appeal Court?s today judgment that overturned the Court of First Instance on December 3, 2007 that

sanctions determined by the Civil Sanction Committee, the SEC therefore requested the public prosecutor in writing to file a lawsuit against {A} in the Civil Court, pressing for civil sanctions with the

. Por. 5964/2562. On 22 December 2020, the Appeal Court rendered the judgement,* opposing the Civil Court’s decision. In this regard, the defendant is required to pay civil penalty twice the amount of

Appeal Court rendered a judgement* amending the Civil Court’s judgement, by requiring the defendant to pay (1) a civil penalty, twice the amount of the benefits that the defendant received or would have

The Constitutional Court has passed a unanimous ruling that the presumption of persons having known or possessed the inside information under Section 243 and Section 244 of the Securities and

The SEC Civil Sanction Committee (CSC) had earlier resolved to impose civil sanctions on all four offenders of this case, among which only two agreed to comply with the specified civil sanctions. However, the other two, namely, (1) LLC Fair Expo company and (2) Mr. Mikalai Zahorski, who are subject to a total monetary civil sanction of 6,005,620 baht (a civil penalty and a reimbursement of investigative expenses incurred by the SEC), refused to comply with the specified civil sanctions, which wa...

lawsuit against Surin in the Civil, pressing for civil sanctions with the highest legal penalty. SEC has sought the Court’s ruling to require Surin to pay a civil fine, compensate the benefits received

of Benson Dupont Capital Management.? On the grounds that the accused person?s deposition was beneficial to the case, the Court sentenced Ravi to a two-year imprisonment.? The Court, however, dismissed

Bangkok May 9, 2012 ? The Southern Bangkok Criminal Court, on April 24 2012, sentenced Ratchanee Panich to a fine of 1,259,323.11 baht for aiding or abetting Apichart Rungruengacheeva (formerly Wisit